DBEA55AED16C0C92252A6554BC1553B2 Clicky DBEA55AED16C0C92252A6554BC1553B2 Clicky
July 17, 2024
Care to share?

Given the paucity of good news from the commercial aviation industry, why not take a look at data for 1Q20? Here is a combination of data from the US DoT T-2 and Form41.   This selection shows the US airline single-aisle airline fleet in terms of fuel burn/seat/hour and overall flight costs/seat/hour.

The data is sorted in descending order by flights ops costs.  Some observations:

  • The A220-100 has a low fuel burn, but overall is not that low cost to operate.  It is exclusively (during the period) operated by Delta Air Lines.  Are Delta’s other costs, specifically labor, an issue? When looking at Delta alone, the pattern remains as we see above.  This could have interesting implications for major airlines operating the smaller jets between 100-130 seats.  To wit, note the E-190 numbers.
  • Boeing may have been on to something when they claimed the 737NG was competitive with the A320neo family.  The data supports this.   If we select one airline to take out variables (we selected Delta again), then the 737-900ER has 14.6% lower over operating costs than the A321. At Alaska, where both the NG and neo are in service, the 737-900ER is 14.9% better than the A321neo. 

Looking forward to your comments.

author avatar
Addison Schonland
Co-Founder AirInsight. My previous life includes stints at Shell South Africa, CIC Research, and PA Consulting. Got bitten by the aviation bug and ended up an Avgeek. Then the data bug got me, making me a curious Avgeek seeking data-driven logic. Also, I appreciate conversations with smart people from whom I learn so much. Summary: I am very fortunate to work with and converse with great people.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.