This story from the New York Times expounds in detail the nature of the regulatory approval processes from the FAA the tacitly endorsed Boeing’s failure to disclose a new system to pilots during transition training. It appears that a failure of that system, and a lack of training in how to shut it off, were major contributing factors to the crash of a Lion Air Boeing 737MAX that killed 189 people.
Analysis
The focus of the investigators is the MCAS, the maneuvering characteristics augmentation system, which can push the nose down to compensate for a potential aerodynamic stall of the airplane in certain circumstances. It appears that the system malfunctioned, and since pilots were not trained on that system, were unaware of its characteristics or how to shut it off. Boeing’s position is that the Lion Air pilots should have known how to handle the emergency, even not knowing about the modification in the MAX model
that was not in previous models.
Insight
Our judgment is that a dangerous element in flight is a software system that reacts to faulty inputs. We have seen a crash of an Airbus A330 off the coast of Brazil that appears to be related to a pilot tube failure, and now this Lion Air crash that may have been caused by a faulty angle of attack sensor. In either case, had the pilots been able to quickly revert the aircraft to manual mode and simply fly the aircraft, both accidents could have been avoided. The key may be a master switch to shut off all automated software, enabling pilots to do what they do best – fly the airplane and safely bring it down to correct the malfunctions. Maybe it is time that an emergency kill switch be installed to instantly revert the aircraft to fully manual mode to enable pilots to quickly and simply do their jobs in the event of an emergency or system failure.
We use cookies to optimize our website and our service.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.