DBEA55AED16C0C92252A6554BC1553B2 Clicky DBEA55AED16C0C92252A6554BC1553B2 Clicky
June 15, 2024
Care to share?

A controversial tweet from Donald Trump has caused concerns about the future of Air Force One.  The President Elect tweeted —

The President Elect appears to be coming down hard on one of the key companies he supports for job creation and international trade, likely as a show of force to reduce the budget for the airplane.

The reality of the situation is that Air Force One isn’t just any 747.  It needs to operate as an airborne command post, communication center, be protected from electromagnetic pulses from nuclear blasts,  incorporate missile defense systems, be capable of airborne refueling, and operate in extremes, whether polar cold or desert hot, using internal systems.  None of those are standard on a commercial 747, and are very high cost items.  The current 747-200s, long out of production, are 30 years old and becoming more difficult to maintain.  Clearly, replacements are needed and have been planned.  The question now is whether the deal will be re-negotiated, or the project scope changed.

Boeing responded to the tweet with the following statement:

“We are currently under contract for US$170 million to help determine the capabilities of these complex military aircraft that serve the unique requirements of the President of the United States. We look forward to working with the U.S. Air Force on subsequent phases of the program allowing us to deliver the best planes for the President at the best value for the American taxpayer.”

Our view is that US$170 million for a feasibility study is quite high, given what Boeing already knows about Air Force One, having build the last few airplanes.  They already know what the key requirements are, and the price for what is essentially a capabilities assessment is about the same as what you could purchase a 747-8i for in today’s market.  That seems excessive, given the institutional knowledge Boeing should possess.  But since the last Air Force One program was completed 30 years ago, there is a lot of technology catch-up, and most of the senior people involved in the first program are likely to be retired.  But an element of the process that looks like re-inventing the wheel may have the President-Elect upset.

Yes, there are new threats and new countermeasures.  But Boeing Military has dealt with them on other programs and military aircraft.  The 747-8 on which Air Force One will be based is still a 747, with better performance and economics than earlier models, and will still need to be custom-designed to accommodate the requirements of a Commander in Chief under threat.  And Boeing knows the 747 better than anyone.

The Bottom Line:

We can’t see Donald Trump going for an Airbus A380 for Air Force One, so Boeing will ultimately get the contract.  The question is will Trump shave off 5-10% of the contract in re-negotiations, or will he ask for the original three airplanes originally requested instead of the two included in the $4B contract price?  The latter seems  quite possible, even though Boeing is the only domestically sourced choice available for this mission.  But knowing so, has Boeing estimated its costs knowing there isn’t a viable alternative?

The author of “The Art of the Deal” is unlikely to take on agreements without challenging them, and this is his first shot across the bow of the defense industry to tighten their belts and deliver better value.  The more important question is what the next targets might be, with the under performing and high cost F-35 program a potential candidate for the same agenda. The tone in Washington is changing, and remember that the President-Elect did say he wants to be unpredictable.

3 thoughts on “The President Elect, Boeing, and Air Force One

  1. “It needs to operate as an airborne command post, communication center, be protected from electromagnetic pulses from nuclear blasts, incorporate missile defense systems, be capable of airborne refueling, and operate in extremes, whether polar cold or desert hot, using internal systems.”

    To be honest, its only Yankee paranoia that says it “needs” to operate as any of these things to the degree requested. The rest of the world can function without all of these items in an all-singing-all-dancing intercontinental ranged VIP aircraft, so why not the USA?

    If you truly believe the rest of the world is not in the same degree of danger as the USA, then maybe better to question the reasons behind that than throw more taxpayer dollars at the military-industrial complex.

  2. I’m pretty sure the $172 million is for a lot more than a capabilities assessment. Without taking the time to look up whatever public details are available, from past reporting, my impression was it is for initial high level design of the modifications – figuring what systems are needed, how they fit in, what basic structural changes are necessary, etc.

    Also, the detailed R&D and modification contracts, which will be where most of the cost goes, are not signed yet. The most likely way to save money is reducing the scope of the modifications. Smaller savings can usually be had by changing the way design changes are handled, trading profit for lower risk on the part of the supplier (and therefore more risk of cost growth on the part of the buyer).

  3. The development cost is so far out of what is expected that you have to wonder if there is a black program tucked away there.
    The communications are not much different than that of the E6 looking glass mission but in a larger airframe. Since Boeing is only the supplier of the green airframes, you can turn to the companies who are making the avionics as prime contractor. As was shown with KC46 tanker Boeing isnt so great at adding modifications made by other contractors to its own airplanes, but luckily the USAF had a fixed price contract on that one.
    But its good to see that Trump has his eye of some of the crazy wasteful Pentagon spending.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.