DBEA55AED16C0C92252A6554BC1553B2 Clicky DBEA55AED16C0C92252A6554BC1553B2 Clicky
October 12, 2024
Care to share?

Generally in the west, we tend to view China’s aerospace efforts somewhat dismissively.  After some Chinese aircraft bear uncanny resemblances to designs from Airbus, Antonov or Sukhoi. Perhaps we might want to revisit that thinking.  China’s Shaanxi Aircraft Corporation, part of the AVIC combine, has been building its Y-9 military freighter for some time. First flight was late 2010.

2016-09-19_9-18-19

The Y-9 is thought to be a more advanced copy of the Antonov AN-12.  The Y-9 has Chinese-made turboprop engines and a Chinese six bladed composite propeller.  The table below shows that the Y-9 is not an exact replica of the AN-12, but it is close and larger. 2016-09-19_9-40-57China feels good enough about its Y-9 to put it in competition for Thailand’s planned replacement of its C-130Hs.  Lockheed Martin is offering the C-130J (although the J first flew in 1996, the core design is 1950’s era).  In some respects the Y-9 offers more than the C-130J.  Almost certainly the Y-9 will cheaper than the C-130J.

A win for the Y-9 will send an unsettling message.

author avatar
Addison Schonland
Co-Founder AirInsight. My previous life includes stints at Shell South Africa, CIC Research, and PA Consulting. Got bitten by the aviation bug and ended up an Avgeek. Then the data bug got me, making me a curious Avgeek seeking data-driven logic. Also, I appreciate conversations with smart people from whom I learn so much. Summary: I am very fortunate to work with and converse with great people.

3 thoughts on “China flexes aerospace muscle

  1. Do you have an explanation why is China capable of building a good aircraft like the Y-9 or even build a space ship and at the same time there having so much problems with the ARJ21 or the C919?

  2. Its still a newer version of the An 12 or its chinese copy the Y-8. So we cant really call it a new design and just follows in the Chinese tradition of ‘copy more’

  3. Possibly the easiest explanation would be that the Y-9 benefited by being derived from the AN-12. While the ARJ-21 also was derived from a previous design, it is commercial and therefore more complicated. The C919 is an even more complicated project and is not obviously derived from the A320.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.