A couple of news stories emerged that could cast some doubt on the imminent return of the MAX. One story speaks of alternative Boeing strategies to retain production employees in the event of a factory shutdown, and another highlights United moving MAX aircraft away from its hub into the desert some five months after the shutdown.
Neither of these stories seems to support an imminent return to service. Boeing
worries about employee retention may be contingency planning, but it belies the certainty with which their CEO proclaims a service re-entry before year end. While United may be concerned about hurricanes, moving aircraft to the desert after sitting five months at their Houston hub and LAX seems illogical, and something that should have been done months ago, as Southwest and other airlines have done. Of course, having all the aircraft in one place for return to service maintenance would make sense, but it would seem easier to accomplish at a maintenance base at a hub airport rather than flying technicians to the desert.
Analysis
Should the MAX re-entry to service not be approved quickly, which is a possibility with the issue of potential rudder cable damage from an un-contained engine failure was brought forward by the New York Times at the end of last month. While there have been no comments from regulators, the public disclosure of an issue will make it difficult for international regulators to ignore the potential problem.
A couple of news stories emerged that could cast some doubt on the imminent return of the MAX.One story speaks of alternative Boeing strategies to retain production employees in the event of a factory shutdown, and another highlights United moving MAX aircraft away from its hub into the desert some five months after the shutdown.
Neither of these stories seems to support an imminent return to service.Boeing worries about employee retention may be contingency planning, but it belies the certainty with which their CEO proclaims a service re-entry before year end.While United may be concerned about hurricanes, moving aircraft to the desert after sitting five months at their Houston hub and LAX seems illogical, and something that should have been done months ago, as Southwest and other airlines have done. Of course, having all the aircraft in one place for return to service maintenance would make sense, but it would seem easier to accomplish at a maintenance base at a hub airport rather than flying technicians to the desert.
We use cookies to optimize our website and our service.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
